Back to Instant X Profile Audit
This is an example report— exactly how a real audit looks, block by block. Yours will run on your own account’s live data.
63/ 100
Analyzed Aug 26, 2026

X/Twitter Score

GoodDecent baseline with clear room to grow.
DesignPersonalen-US62 posts analyzed
Account
Sample Creator (demo)@sample_creator_demo
1.9K following · 4.8K followers
Post Consistency
53/100
Replies
64/100
Content Mix
77/100
Profile
67/100
Timing
65/100

Summary

There is a real account in here and it is being outvoted by its own feed. When you write about something you shipped, with a number in it, people show up — one of those posts did twenty times your baseline. But a third of what you put out is somebody else's work, and most of it is the same three accounts, so a new visitor scrolling your profile meets your taste before they meet your voice. You also post about half as often as this niche needs, took twelve days off in the middle of the window. None of that is a talent problem. Post the shipping notes twice as often and cut the reposts in half — the reach is already there in the one post that broke out.

What's working

  • Replied every day this week — engagement stays consistent
  • Strong topic variety and format mix
  • Healthy mix of text and visual formats
  • Healthy follower-to-following ratio — reads as a creator account, not a follow-back hunter
  • Avatar is recognizable and on-brand
  • "Shipping in public" is a proven winner — outperforms your baseline
  • 2 breakout posts in the window — you have formats that can pop
  • Engagement rate is healthy — viewers react, not just scroll
  • Writing style reads clean — no emoji/hashtag/link drags

What's hurting you

  • 8 of the last 8 weeks fell below your minimum cadence
  • Longest silence in the window: 12 days
  • Reply cadence is 10.6/day — close to but under the 15/day minimum
  • 7 of the last 7 days fell below the 15/day reply target
  • Under-investing in "Shipping in public" — it outperforms but is only 23% of posts
  • 30% of your feed is reposts — original posts travel further
  • 19 of your 26 reposts came from 3 accounts
  • 50% of posts hit recommended windows — room to push more into peak hours
  • Bio: "building small things" does not say what you build or for whom.
  • Bio: "dm open" spends a line of a 160-character bio on something the DM button already says.

Suggested fixes

10 actions · +27 pts potential

Critical

· Fix first — biggest score gain
3 · +14 pts
  • Fill the weak weeks
    +6 pts

    8 of the last 8 weeks fell below your cadence target. Schedule a batch of evergreen posts to cover low-activity windows.

  • Bio: "building small things" does not say what you build or for whom.
    +4 pts

    Name the thing: what you are building, who it is for, one proof.

  • Bio: "dm open" spends a line of a 160-character bio on something the DM button already says.
    +4 pts

    Replace "dm open" with the link or the result you want people to act on.

Moderate

· Meaningful wins worth scheduling
5 · +11 pts
  • Push replies to 15+/day
    +4 pts

    You're at 10.6 replies/day. Clear the 15/day minimum, then work toward 30/day — that's where reply activity starts compounding. A second daily reply round (lunch or evening) usually closes this gap.

  • Make replies a daily habit
    +4 pts

    7 of the last 7 days dropped below 15/day. Lock in a recurring slot in your calendar — 30 minutes, same time every day — so reply volume doesn't depend on motivation.

  • Close your biggest silence
    +3 pts

    Your longest gap was 12 days. Queue a 3-5 post mini-series to avoid silences over a week.

  • Post more about "Shipping in public"

    "Shipping in public" outperforms your baseline but is only 23% of what you publish. Shift your topic mix — aim for 25-35% in your winning lane.

  • Turn reposts into quote-posts

    You're inside the healthy range for now (50% is where it starts costing you), but a bare repost adds nothing of yours. Quote it with one line of your own take instead — same signal boost, and it reads as your post.

Minor

· Polish after the big rocks
2 · +2 pts
  • Shift a few posts into peak windows
    +2 pts

    50% of posts land in the recommended windows — about half are off-peak. Your strongest slots so far: Wed 10:00-11:00. Shift a few off-peak posts there and watch what happens to reach.

  • Widen who you amplify

    Most of what you boost comes from @deploy_diary, @uxnotes_daily, @ship_it_weekly. Amplifying a narrow circle keeps you inside it — their audience already sees them. Spread reposts across accounts whose followers haven't met you yet.

Your winning template

what your top posts have in common
Repeatable recipe

A decision you made, the number it moved, then the one objection you got.

It reads as a report rather than advice, so people who do not know you can check it. The objection at the end is what makes the replies useful.

Next draft

Write about the last thing you removed from the product and what happened after.

When you post

Times shown in America/New_York
12am1am2am3am4am5am6am7am8am9am10am11am12pm1pm2pm3pm4pm5pm6pm7pm8pm9pm10pm11pm
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
less
more posts
Your best-performing times · based on analysis of your 62 posts
Weekdays
  • Wed 10:00-11:005.1×
Weekends
  • No standout weekend slots yet.
Recommended for your niche · industry benchmarks
Weekdays
  • Mon-Fri 08:00-10:00
  • Mon-Fri 13:00-14:00
  • Mon-Fri 19:00-21:00
Weekends
  • Sat-Sun 08:00-10:00
  • Sat-Sun 12:00-15:00
  • Sat-Sun 20:00-22:00
Your best days
Wed 2.7× your average (9 posts)

Multipliers (e.g. 1.4×) compare engagement in that slot to your overall average.

Post Consistency

Last 2 months
59 original · 26 reposts (30% of 88 posts) — reposts aren't analyzed
Overall read

Only 0% of weeks hit the 14/wk minimum — cadence is the weakest link here. 1 silent week in that window. Longest silence: 12 days — the algorithm cools down fast on gaps that long. Best week hit 10 posts.

Median gap
<1d
Typical time between posts
Longest silence
12d
Jul 1 – Jul 13
Weeks below target
8/8
Min: 14+ posts/wk · good: 21+
Best weekOn targetBelow targetavg 6.4/wk

Reply activity

Last 7 days
Overall read

Averaging 10.6 replies/day — close to but under the 15/day minimum. 7/7 days fell below the 15/day minimum. Best day hit 14 replies.

Replies / day
10.6
Min 15/day · good 30–200/day
Days without replies
0/7
Days with zero reply activity
Days below target
7/7
Min: 15+ replies/day
Best dayOn targetBelow targetavg 10.6/day

Profile fundamentals

Bio · Avatar · Name
Bio
54/100
building small things | design + code | dm open
  • "building small things" does not say what you build or for whom.
  • "dm open" spends a line of a 160-character bio on something the DM button already says.
  • Name the thing: what you are building, who it is for, one proof.
  • Replace "dm open" with the link or the result you want people to act on.
Avatar
84/100
Profile avatar
  • Solid. Small tweaks could still earn the last few points.
Display name
58/100
Sample Creator (demo)@sample_creator_demo
  • The name carries no category — a stranger reading it in a reply thread learns nothing.
  • Adding two words of what you do would make the name searchable.

Your breakout posts

2 posts · ≥3× median

These posts beat your own median engagement by 3× or more. Whatever's different here is your fastest path to repeatable reach.

Sample Creator (demo)
@sample_creator_demo
49.4× median

I deleted 60% of our settings screen and nobody complained. Here is the list of what went, what stayed, and the one preference three people emailed about within a day.

1.2K9627241.8K
Sample Creator (demo)
@sample_creator_demo
3.5× median

20 second walkthrough of the new keyboard shortcuts. No narration, just hands.

889135.2K

Writing style

craft signals
Overall read

Your writing style reads clean — no overuse of emojis, hashtags, or links, and length is reasonable.

Emojis
Natural
0 / post
0% of posts
Hashtags
Clean
0 / post
0% of posts
Mentions
0 / post
0% of posts
Links
Rare
0% of posts
0.00 links / post avg

Topics and clusters that earn their keep

what to double down on
Your topic lever
Shipping notes pay; opinions do not.

The posts where you describe something you actually changed carry the account. The one-line product opinions are the largest share of your output and the smallest share of your reach — they are cheap to write, which is exactly why there are so many of them.

By topic cluster

AI-inferred
  • Shipping in public
    23% feed

    Earns 54% more than your average post

    14 posts · 172.9 avg eng

    1.54× your typical post across 14 posts, and performance is consistent — this is a repeatable lane.

Formats and lengths that earn your engagement

format & length · what to shift
Your lever
Your text posts do the work; the media posts are decoration.

Plain text is where this account earns attention — the longest, most specific posts pull several times the reach of the short ones. Images and video land above your text average per post, but there are so few of them that they cannot lift the account. The pattern is not "post more media", it is "the posts that carry a number outperform the posts that carry a mood".

By format

81% of your posts are Text. A single format dominating caps your reach with the algorithm. Test another format 3-5 times before ruling it out.
Your mix
81%
Text · 81%Image · 11%Video · 5%Carousel · 3%
  • TextKeep
    Posts
    81%
    Engagement
    79%
    65.7 avg engagement/post · 50 posts

    Carrying its weight — keep the current cadence.

  • ImageKeep
    Posts
    11%
    Engagement
    10%
    60.7 avg engagement/post · 7 posts

    Carrying its weight — keep the current cadence.

  • VideoKeep
    Posts
    5%
    Engagement
    7%
    96.7 avg engagement/post · 3 posts

    Carrying its weight — keep the current cadence.

  • CarouselToo few
    Posts
    3%
    Engagement
    4%
    87.5 avg engagement/post · 2 posts

    Only 2 posts here — not enough to judge.

Length breakdown needs a wider post-length spread — your posts are too uniform in length to split.

Engagement health

what to fix first
Overall
Needs work4.8K followers · 1.9K following

Engagement is below healthy ranges. Focus on one lever at a time — start with the biggest.

Fix this first
Reply rate0.21%Low

End posts with a direct question or a take people will want to push back on. Pick 3 this week and compare.

Engagements per view
OK
2.91%
ok 1.00%good 3.00%

How often a viewer reacts. Measures hook + payoff strength.

2.3K views · 67.3 engagements per post
Reply rate
Low
0.21%
ok 0.50%good 2.00%

Share of viewers who reply. Conversation density drives algorithmic reach on X.

Quote rate
OK
0.047%
ok 0.02%good 0.10%

Share of viewers who quote-tweet your post with their own take. Retweets are zero-effort boosts; quote-tweets are the quality amplification signal on X.

68 reposts/quotes across 62 posts
Engagement rate (followers)
OK
1.40%
ok 0.50%good 2.00%

Avg engagements per post against your follower count — the classic ER everyone benchmarks.

Content mix

original vs amplified
OK88 items

67% original · 3% quote posts · 30% reposts.

30% of your feed is reposts. It starts costing you above 50%.

A bare repost adds nothing of yours. Quote it with your own take instead — same boost, and it reads as your post.

0.65/day over the last 40.2 days.

Who you amplify7 accounts

Most of what you boost comes from a handful of accounts — their followers already see them. Spreading it wider is how reposting reaches people who haven't met you.

Your report looks like this — for your account, in about 2 minutes. On this page, in your email, and as a PDF.

Start my audit — $4.99